From d1187641d64f442968a3b9ea6a19de6cdd45acd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Keith Packard Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:16:50 -0800 Subject: Rename inappropriately named 'mask' fields to 'proposed_flags' instead. Flags pending validation were stored in a misleadingly named field, 'mask'. As 'mask' is already used to indicate pieces of a flags field which are changing, it seems better to use a name reflecting the actual purpose of this field. I chose 'proposed_flags' as they may not actually end up in 'flags', and in an case will be modified when they are moved over. This affects the API, but not ABI of the user-mode interface. --- linux-core/drm_vm.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'linux-core/drm_vm.c') diff --git a/linux-core/drm_vm.c b/linux-core/drm_vm.c index f2681cc9..dcefcb34 100644 --- a/linux-core/drm_vm.c +++ b/linux-core/drm_vm.c @@ -751,10 +751,10 @@ static unsigned long drm_bo_vm_nopfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, */ if (!(bo->mem.flags & DRM_BO_FLAG_MAPPABLE)) { - uint32_t new_mask = bo->mem.mask | + uint32_t new_flags = bo->mem.proposed_flags | DRM_BO_FLAG_MAPPABLE | DRM_BO_FLAG_FORCE_MAPPABLE; - err = drm_bo_move_buffer(bo, new_mask, 0, 0); + err = drm_bo_move_buffer(bo, new_flags, 0, 0); if (err) { ret = (err != -EAGAIN) ? NOPFN_SIGBUS : NOPFN_REFAULT; goto out_unlock; -- cgit v1.2.3